good times local news media events catalyst santa cruz california metro silicon valley news local events san jose weekly aptos, capitola, soquel, local news events paper gilroy dispatch local news events garlic festival santa cruz media events local california weekly king city rustler newspaper media local events car sales buy new car media
58.3 F
Watsonville
English English Español Español
February 8, 2023

Violent, court-ordered removal of children sparks community outcry

SANTA CRUZ—For the purposes of this article, Maya and Sebastian Laing’s story begins on Oct. 20, when a group of strangers paid a late-night visit to their grandmother’s house where they had been staying. 

After trying unsuccessfully to convince the kids to come with them willingly, the strangers carried them kicking and screaming to a waiting car. From there, they were taken to an undisclosed location in Los Angeles, a 350-mile drive. 

Because 15-year-old Maya expected this to happen, she had told several friends to be ready for her call. They showed up en masse, bringing families and neighbors with them. 

One of these people took a video detailing the transporters’ actions, which garnered more than 100,000 views before YouTube removed it. It still exists on Instagram at here and here. Be warned, the content is disturbing.

The strangers were “transporters” from Assisted Interventions, Inc., a privately contracted company based in New Jersey that carries out court orders to move children—always under court order—in contentious custody disputes.

Maya and Sebastian’s situation is not unique. Children thus embroiled are often taken to “reunification camps,” where the parent on the other end of the dispute waits, along with counselors and other employees tasked with patching up their relationship.

In the days preceding that event, Maya took to her own Instagram account, telling her followers she did not want to live with her mother. See her talking about the situation on Instagram here and here.

The Pajaronian is not delving into the drawn-out, combative divorce and custody fight between Maya and Sebastian’s parents, and as such will not hash out the details here. 

The fact relevant to this story—the one that Maya and Sebastian’s video thrust into public view—is that children can be taken against their will, with full concurrence of the court.

A closer look

In the video, one man can be seen carrying a struggling 11-year-old Sebastian from behind. That is followed by two men carrying Maya—one grasping her legs and the other her arms—as she screams that she is being kidnapped. Witnesses say her clothes came partially off during the struggle, and that her hair was stepped on and her face slammed into a car door.

All of this took place as two Santa Cruz Police Officers stood watching. But Santa Cruz Police Deputy Chief Jon Bush says that none of what took place in the video was illegal.

The transporters, he says, were duly authorized to take Maya and Sebastian, and were doing so under the order of Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Rebecca Connolly.

“The order allowed this contracted transportation company to physically take possession of the kids and to transport them to a location in Southern California,” Bush said. 

He stressed that the officers were not there specifically to assist the transporters. Instead, they were called to the scene for a report of a disturbance.

Once there, their job was solely to keep the peace, he said.

On their website, Assisted Interventions, Inc. states that the company’s goal is to have children arrive at treatment facilities in a “positive frame of mind,” and that it was founded “on the principles of Dignity, Compassion and Safety.”

The company did not respond to requests for comment. 

The community responds

The fact that what happened is legal is cold comfort for the people who know the kids and saw them being taken against their will.

Maya and Sebastian Laing take to Instagram to tell their story.

“We want to spread awareness to what’s going on,” says Kiersten Dungy, 16, who has known Maya for two years and attended Pacific Collegiate School with her. 

Dungy helped organize an Oct. 27 candlelight vigil—which drew about 50 people—and a protest the next day in front of the County Courthouse in Watsonville, where family court is held. 

She also placed herself between the transporters and Maya in an attempt to stop them, before police officers told her to stop interfering.

“We want to end reunification camps, because no human should have to go through what Maya and Sebastian and all these other kids have gone through,” Dungy said. 

Friends at the candlelight vigil described Maya as a quiet, bright, friendly, selfless, thoughtful girl who remembered every detail of what her friends like.

She is adventurous and athletic, plays volleyball, participates in theater and is a student government leader, friends said.

Sebastian is described as a smart, funny boy who hopes to go to Pacific Collegiate School with his sister next year.

Family friend Matt Berlin said the children’s father has no idea where they are.

“He doesn’t know if they’re safe, he hasn’t seen pictures of them, he has no idea the status of his kids, and he is heartbroken,” he said. 

Berlin said his friend is “an amazing parent.”

“He is one of the best fathers I’ve ever met in my entire life,” he said. “He loves his kids so much. He would do anything for them.”

Tina Swithin, an internationally known blogger who advocates for change in the family court system, describes the industry surrounding reunification centers as “like something out of a sci-fi movie.”

“I know parents who haven’t seen their kids in two years after they are taken away to these camps because what essentially the court orders give full rights to the people who own the camps, and they are making a lot of money off these things.”

And a lucrative business it is. Danielle Pollack, Policy Manager at George Washington University’s National Family Violence Law Center says that a single day at one of “reunification treatment”  can cost as much as $10,000.

What are reunification camps?

The idea stems from “parental alienation,” a concept first defined in the 1980s in which parents engage in a system of behaviors designed to alienate the other parent from their children. This can include maligning that parent to the kids, as well as stopping the other parent from seeing their children entirely. Alienation can also come from children who stop communicating with a parent because they are angry about a divorce.  

Often, courts in those cases will employ counselors to try to seek an amicable familial resolution.

But parents can also weaponize the concept, using it as a counter-claim when their ex-spouse accuses them of abuse, saying the other is simply being vindictive and angry and attempting to separate them from their kids.

In these cases, children are taken to a reunification camp, a catch-all phrase that can include hotels, nature retreats or, in the case of Maya and Sebastian, the home of Los Angeles-based psychologist Lynn Steinberg.

Normally, Swithin says, the children are restricted from contacting anyone for at least 90 days.

“They’re not allowed to reach out to anybody,” Swithin says. “Which is part of what makes it so hard to grasp that they can do this.”

Steinberg did not respond to numerous requests for comment.

Pollack says that this strategy often works.

Mothers frequently lose contested custody cases where they allege abuse, and fathers cross-claim “alienation,” she says.

“In 73% of these cases, mothers who allege abuse lose custody to the accused when the courts believe she is an ‘alienator’ sometimes even when courts acknowledge the father has abused the mother or children,” she says.

“It’s an effective legal strategy,” she says. “It really tears down the credibility of the person alleging the abuse.”

Pollack describes the concept of parental alienation as “junk science” that has nevertheless garnered legitimacy in court hearings, since people purporting to be alienation experts testify during hearings.

“Part of the reason why it’s so effective is there is a large cottage industry serving the accused abusers,” she says. “They come in and they testify as ‘alienation experts,’ as if their junk science theories were scientific and valid and are diagnosable. In fact, it’s not scientifically supported.”

Perhaps the most terrifying aspect of the industry is that it is largely unregulated, Pollack says. That’s because they are considered “educational” and therefore do not need the licenses required of psychological or counseling services, Pollack says. 

“Every valid area has a licensing board,” she says. “But these guys duck it.”

Once in the camps, with stays that last a few days to several months, the children are forced to spend time with the parent with whom they are resisting contact, and to interact with “reunification counselors” who try to convince them that the abuse they are alleging did not happen, Pollack says.

Children in the camps are forbidden to talk about subjects such as the past and their parents’ divorce, she said.

In some places, parents are similarly forbidden to talk about the cases with their kids. Others have employees called “green shirts” who come to sit between parent and child to change the subject if such conversations occur, Pollack says.

A protest and candlelight vigil—which drew about 50 people—was held in front of the County Courthouse in Watsonville last week. (Todd Guild/The Pajaronian)

What the children want

A minor’s desire to stay with one parent frequently does not factor into a judge’s ruling, Pollack says.

“It matters very little,” she says. 

Part of that, she says, is due to who represents children in court.

Usually kids are represented by a guardian ad litem—also called a best interest attorney—who forms an opinion about what’s best for them. 

While this was meant to shield the kids from the often traumatic process, it often does not represent what the children want, since the guardian must consider all facts of the case.

“So the voice of the child over the past 20 years has really gone out of the process in many ways,” Pollack says.

Taking action locally

In a press conference Thursday, Santa Cruz Mayor Sonia Brunner and Santa Cruz County Supervisor Ryan Coonerty vowed to take action to prevent companies from violently taking children from their homes within the county.

“We regulate taxis and lots of other kinds of services, so this will be another business we want to make sure is operating consistent with our values,” Coonerty said. 

While the court system falls outside the County’s authority, a local ordinance setting standards for how minors are treated, Coonerty said, could give law enforcement officials more authority to intervene in similar situations.

Coonerty also said the County will urge State lawmakers to pass policies to regulate these businesses.

Dungy hopes that whatever policies local leaders pass contains a “no-touching policy” for private transportation companies.

“So that kids who are court ordered to be sent to reunification camps can be treated as human beings in their travels,” she said.

The kids’ mother Jessica Laing referred calls for comment to her attorney, who declined to talk on the record.

Their father Justin Laing declined to talk about the details of the legal case. But he said in a text message that “my heart is breaking for my kids.”

“What happened to them is not OK. I will pursue every legal avenue to make this right for them.”

5 COMMENTS

  1. This is why you don’t have children with someone you aren’t compatible with. Shame on the pajaronian for not bringing the full story to light about the divorce. Do we know who the parents are and how they have been raising their children? Nope.

    In terms of what the children want it’s not their decision they are underage. Unless their parents are abusing them then there should be no reason two adults be able to communicate with a mediator and come to a resolution in what’s best for the children. Both parents in their lives is what’s best and will always be best unless they are abusing them then that’s a whole different scenario.

    Yes it’s unfortunate how the children were taken but what if they complied with the adults and just went with them I’m sure the drama would not have occurred. But kids will be kids and be dramatic.

  2. Yet another article where this half baked publication publishes half the story. Publish all the details so the readers can make a decision. That’s The half assed reporting We have come to expect.

    Todd the are hiring Greeters at Walmart ill I will send you an application.
    Monique, did Sh*thead Steve block you yet? It’s nice over here on the dark side with no comments from him.

    WT

    • No not yet but we all know that’s what leftists do when they don’t want to come to term with facts right in front of their eyes. That’s okay just goes to show that they love immersing themselves in an echo chamber so they think everyone is on the same page. When in reality that’s far from the truth.

  3. Yes, the children were removed from the custodial parents’ home, but only after the absent parent had to go to extremes for a court order. These types of situations just don’t happen overnight, but after a couple of years or longer of legalities. Let the legal process run its course, because one or both of these parents let it get to this point.

  4. do you know how many kids will end up committing suicide or murder over judges forcing these kids when really it shud be the parents in that camp they didnt ask for the parents splitup

    • Please sign me up for the newsletter - Yes

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

ARTS & CULTURE

Stephen Kessler named 2023 Artist of the Year

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY—Writer Stephen Kessler has been named the 2023 Artist of the Year by the Santa Cruz County Arts Commission.  Kessler has written a...